Who is Andrew Doyle on the Jordan Peterson Podcast?
On this Season 4 Episode 32 Episode of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan is joined by British comedian, author, playwright, journalist, political satirist, and voice of Titania McGrath, Andrew Doyle. Andrew Doyle and Jordan discuss his new book, “Free Speech and Why It Matters”, the hate ...
Who is John Vervaeke on the Jordan Peterson Podcast?
On this Season 4, Episode 34 of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan is joined by John Vervaeke, a colleague of Jordan’s. John has been an associate professor in the teaching stream at the University of Toronto since 1994.
Who is Michael malice on the Jordan Peterson Podcast?
On Season 4 Episode 30 of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan Peterson is joined by Michael Malice. Michael Malice is a New York City-based author, podcaster, columnist, and media personality.
See more
A Conversation with Jordan Peterson
In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson discuss science, religion, archetypes, mythology, and the perennial problem of finding meaning in life.
Subscribe to the Making Sense Podcast
The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support. If you find it valuable, please consider subscribing through this website.
What are the categories used in Peterson's lecture?
These categories include the individual (hero/adversary), culture (wise king/tyrant), and nature (destruction/creation). The heroic ...
Who is the host of the episode "Everything is f*cked"?
Mikhaila Peterson co-hosts this episode. In this episode, we spoke with Mark Manson, a best-selling author of The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck, and more recently, Everything Is F*cked: A Book about Hope, which has sold over thirteen million copies worldwide. He’s also a very ...
Who is Chris Voss?
Chris Voss (former lead FBI hostage and kidnapping negotiator, author, and CEO of Black Swan Ltd.) sits down with Jordan B. Peterson and Mikhaila Peterson, to discuss his book Never Split the Difference, highlighting some of his guiding principles to use in negotiations at work, home, ...
Who is the psychologist who analyzed the Lion King?
Peterson finishes his analysis of Disney's Lion King, which provides a dramatic representation of many of the archetypes identified and analyzed by Dr. Carl Gustav Jung, student of Nietzsche and Freud, and originator of analytical psychology. - Thanks to our sponsors: https://helixsleep.com/jordan ...
What is the case in Part 2 of the lecture?
In Part 2 of this lecture, I make the case that we each inhabit a story, describing where we are, where we are going, and the actions we must undertake to get from the former to the latter. These inhabited stories are predicated on an underlying ...
What is Peterson's argument?
This argument is that a religious or mythical basis for morality arguably has much more influence on Western moral thinking than Harris and his fellow atheists might believe .
What does Peterson argue about ethics?
Peterson, of course, argues that without the mythological narratives he describes, our ethics (which are, in part, predicated on these stories) do not stand up . In contrast, Harris’ theory touches on David Hume’s “is/ought-problem,” which, in turn, relates to the “fact/value-distinction.”.
What chapter does Peterson assume that Raskolnikov was self-informed?
However, in chapter five of Crime and Punishment, we learn how Raskolnikov was self-informed in some sense, prior to his murder.
What is the moral landscape of Harris?
In The Moral Landscape, Harris makes clear that his philosophical theory revolves around the concept of “well-being.”.
Was Peterson unfamiliar to me?
However, Peterson was certainly not unfamiliar to me. Like most fans of Peterson’s during that period, I was well-versed with his ideas, books, and lectures. However, I should admit that when I say well-versed, my understanding of his ideas, at the time, was—it turned out—actually rather superficial.
Does Peterson have fanbase?
Just as Peterson acquired the title “intellectual rockstar,” he has also acquired the fanbase, with fanatical followers. This, in and of itself, is not an issue—so long as these followers accept concrete feedback about the person they so admire.
Is Harris a psychopathic killer?
Therefore, according to Peterson, Harris has unknowingly embodied the transcendent values and morality, seeing that Harris is not a psychopathic murderer. This is why Peterson genuinely believes in Dostoevsky’s eminent saying in The Brothers Karamazov: “Without God all things are permitted.”.
